Equatorial Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Sheep: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square

Equatorial Guinea
0.3554 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.4232 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
93rd
Sri Lanka rank
91st

Sheep: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sri Lanka
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.4232 kg per square kilometre against 0.3554 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0678 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 91st of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2263 kg per square kilometre 1.16 kg per square kilometre 0.9363 kg per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 0.2634 kg per square kilometre 0.8843 kg per square kilometre 0.6209 kg per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.2929 kg per square kilometre 0.9203 kg per square kilometre 0.6273 kg per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 0.3095 kg per square kilometre 0.5445 kg per square kilometre 0.235 kg per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 0.3219 kg per square kilometre 0.3602 kg per square kilometre 0.0383 kg per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 0.341 kg per square kilometre 0.3107 kg per square kilometre 0.0303 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.3529 kg per square kilometre 0.3974 kg per square kilometre 0.0445 kg per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square, Equatorial Guinea or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.4232 kg per square kilometre against 0.3554 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square between Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
0.0678 kg per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sri Lanka rank globally for sheep — manure management (manure treated, n content), per square?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 93rd and Sri Lanka ranks 91st of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/sri-lanka/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sri Lanka: Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.