Kazakhstan vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sheep — Manure management

Kazakhstan
34.48 million kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
154.37 million kg
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
12th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
9th

Sheep — Manure management over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
050.0M100.0M150.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 154.37 million kg against 34.48 million kg in Kazakhstan, a difference of 119.89 million kg.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.5 times Kazakhstan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th of 180 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 44.27 million kg 93.19 million kg 48.92 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 22.52 million kg 91.71 million kg 69.19 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 31.78 million kg 129.48 million kg 97.70 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 34.35 million kg 151.44 million kg 117.09 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — manure management, Kazakhstan or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 154.37 million kg against 34.48 million kg in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — manure management between Kazakhstan and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
119.89 million kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for sheep — manure management?
Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sheep — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/kazakhstan/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/kazakhstan/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Kazakhstan vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sheep — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
229 places, 13,062 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).