Middle Africa vs OECD: Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content)

Middle Africa
13.19 million kg
in 2023
OECD
166.44 million kg
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
4th
OECD rank
4th

Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content) over time

  • Middle Africa
  • OECD
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

OECD currently reports 166.44 million kg against 13.19 million kg in Middle Africa, a difference of 153.25 million kg.

That makes OECD's figure about 12.6 times Middle Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 4th and OECD ranks 4th of 16 groups.

OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa OECD Difference Ahead
1960s 1.11 million kg 228.64 million kg 227.53 million kg OECD
1970s 1.23 million kg 201.94 million kg 200.71 million kg OECD
1980s 1.54 million kg 226.65 million kg 225.12 million kg OECD
1990s 2.59 million kg 249.35 million kg 246.76 million kg OECD
2000s 4.35 million kg 214.64 million kg 210.29 million kg OECD
2010s 7.71 million kg 184.73 million kg 177.02 million kg OECD
2020s 11.96 million kg 171.29 million kg 159.32 million kg OECD

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — manure management, Middle Africa or OECD?
OECD, at 166.44 million kg against 13.19 million kg in Middle Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — manure management between Middle Africa and OECD?
153.25 million kg, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and OECD?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and OECD rank globally for sheep — manure management?
Middle Africa ranks 4th and OECD ranks 4th of 16 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs OECD: Sheep — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/middle-africa/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/middle-africa/oecd/">Middle Africa vs OECD: Sheep — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
229 places, 13,062 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).