Mauritania vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sheep — Share in total livestock

Mauritania
27.69 %LSU
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
4.04 %LSU
in 2023
Mauritania rank
11th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

Sheep — Share in total livestock over time

  • Mauritania
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 27.69 %LSU against 4.04 %LSU in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 23.65 %LSU.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 6.9 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 180 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 16.71 %LSU 5.34 %LSU 11.37 %LSU Mauritania
1970s 21.9 %LSU 4.96 %LSU 16.94 %LSU Mauritania
1980s 22.31 %LSU 4.64 %LSU 17.66 %LSU Mauritania
1990s 23.4 %LSU 4.08 %LSU 19.32 %LSU Mauritania
2000s 25.68 %LSU 3.24 %LSU 22.44 %LSU Mauritania
2010s 26.54 %LSU 4.23 %LSU 22.31 %LSU Mauritania
2020s 27.08 %LSU 4.02 %LSU 23.06 %LSU Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sheep — share in total livestock, Mauritania or United Republic of Tanzania?
Mauritania, at 27.69 %LSU against 4.04 %LSU in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in sheep — share in total livestock between Mauritania and United Republic of Tanzania?
23.65 %LSU, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for sheep — share in total livestock?
Mauritania ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sheep — Share in total livestock. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sheep — Share in total livestock. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-share-in-total-livestock/mauritania/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sheep-share-in-total-livestock/mauritania/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Mauritania vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sheep — Share in total livestock</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sheep — Share in total livestock
Unit
%LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 12,936 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.