Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sheep — Stocks
Sheep — Stocks over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 353.88 million An against 96.46 million An in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 257.42 million An.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 3.7 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th of 180 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 217.60 million An | 100.39 million An | 117.21 million An | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 209.65 million An | 112.11 million An | 97.54 million An | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | 211.43 million An | 132.61 million An | 78.82 million An | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1990s | 184.53 million An | 166.69 million An | 17.84 million An | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | 134.93 million An | 214.86 million An | 79.93 million An | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 100.44 million An | 284.72 million An | 184.28 million An | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 93.79 million An | 342.99 million An | 249.20 million An | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sheep — stocks, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 353.88 million An against 96.46 million An in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sheep — stocks between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 257.42 million An, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for sheep — stocks?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sheep — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).