Middle Africa vs Russian Federation: Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded

Middle Africa
6,657 1000 ha
in 2022
Russian Federation
84,692 1000 ha
in 2022
Middle Africa rank
2nd
Russian Federation rank
1st

Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded over time

  • Middle Africa
  • Russian Federation
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199220072022

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 84,692 1000 ha against 6,657 1000 ha in Middle Africa, a difference of 78,035 1000 ha.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 12.7 times Middle Africa's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 2nd and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 20 groups.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 6,524 1000 ha 87,284 1000 ha 80,760 1000 ha Russian Federation
2000s 6,578 1000 ha 83,013 1000 ha 76,435 1000 ha Russian Federation
2010s 6,619 1000 ha 82,043 1000 ha 75,424 1000 ha Russian Federation
2020s 6,640 1000 ha 84,729 1000 ha 78,089 1000 ha Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded, Middle Africa or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 84,692 1000 ha against 6,657 1000 ha in Middle Africa as of 2022.
What is the difference in shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded between Middle Africa and Russian Federation?
78,035 1000 ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Russian Federation?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Middle Africa and Russian Federation rank globally for shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded?
Middle Africa ranks 2nd and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs Russian Federation: Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/shrubs-and-or-herbaceous-vegetation-aquatic-or-regularly-flooded-area-from-cci-lc/middle-africa/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/shrubs-and-or-herbaceous-vegetation-aquatic-or-regularly-flooded-area-from-cci-lc/middle-africa/russian-federation-2/">Middle Africa vs Russian Federation: Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.