Middle Africa vs Russian Federation: Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded

Middle Africa
1,214 1000 ha
in 2024
Russian Federation
41,355 1000 ha
in 2024
Middle Africa rank
2nd
Russian Federation rank
1st

Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded over time

  • Middle Africa
  • Russian Federation
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k200120122024

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 41,355 1000 ha against 1,214 1000 ha in Middle Africa, a difference of 40,141 1000 ha.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 34.1 times Middle Africa's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 2nd and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 20 groups.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 1,121 1000 ha 55,885 1000 ha 54,765 1000 ha Russian Federation
2010s 1,213 1000 ha 42,799 1000 ha 41,585 1000 ha Russian Federation
2020s 1,207 1000 ha 40,232 1000 ha 39,025 1000 ha Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded, Middle Africa or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 41,355 1000 ha against 1,214 1000 ha in Middle Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded between Middle Africa and Russian Federation?
40,141 1000 ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Russian Federation?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Middle Africa and Russian Federation rank globally for shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded?
Middle Africa ranks 2nd and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded — Area from MODIS. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs Russian Federation: Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/shrubs-and-or-herbaceous-vegetation-aquatic-or-regularly-flooded-area-from-modis/middle-africa/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/shrubs-and-or-herbaceous-vegetation-aquatic-or-regularly-flooded-area-from-modis/middle-africa/russian-federation-2/">Middle Africa vs Russian Federation: Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded — Area from MODIS
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
269 places, 6,390 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.