Cyprus vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sodium nitrate — Import value
Sodium nitrate — Import value over time
- Cyprus
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0.02 1000 USD against 0.02 1000 USD in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Cyprus ranks 162nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 162nd of 169 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.09 1000 USD | 0.9 1000 USD | 0.81 1000 USD | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 0.0633 1000 USD | 0.2667 1000 USD | 0.2033 1000 USD | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sodium nitrate — import value, Cyprus or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Cyprus, at 0.02 1000 USD against 0.02 1000 USD in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2022.
- What is the difference in sodium nitrate — import value between Cyprus and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0 1000 USD, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Cyprus and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for sodium nitrate — import value?
- Cyprus ranks 162nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 162nd of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sodium nitrate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf