Luxembourg vs Turkmenistan: Soil working equipment (trade) — Import Value
Soil working equipment (trade) — Import Value over time
- Luxembourg
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 12,667 1000 USD against 8,500 1000 USD in Turkmenistan, a difference of 4,167 1000 USD.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.5 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 57th and Turkmenistan ranks 60th of 192 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soil working equipment (trade) — import value, Luxembourg or Turkmenistan?
- Luxembourg, at 12,667 1000 USD against 8,500 1000 USD in Turkmenistan as of 2008.
- What is the difference in soil working equipment (trade) — import value between Luxembourg and Turkmenistan?
- 4,167 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Turkmenistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do Luxembourg and Turkmenistan rank globally for soil working equipment (trade) — import value?
- Luxembourg ranks 57th and Turkmenistan ranks 60th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soil working equipment (trade) — Import Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.