Saint Pierre and Miquelon vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Soil working equipment (trade) — Import Value

Saint Pierre and Miquelon
17 1000 USD
in 2008
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
14 1000 USD
in 2008
Saint Pierre and Miquelon rank
175th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
178th

Soil working equipment (trade) — Import Value over time

  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
050100150197019892008

How they compare

Saint Pierre and Miquelon currently reports 17 1000 USD against 14 1000 USD in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 3 1000 USD.

That makes Saint Pierre and Miquelon's figure about 1.2 times Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Saint Pierre and Miquelon ahead.

Saint Pierre and Miquelon ranks 175th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 178th of 192 countries.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1990s 23.29 1000 USD 27.86 1000 USD 4.57 1000 USD Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2000s 21.39 1000 USD 58.33 1000 USD 36.94 1000 USD Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soil working equipment (trade) — import value, Saint Pierre and Miquelon or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Pierre and Miquelon, at 17 1000 USD against 14 1000 USD in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2008.
What is the difference in soil working equipment (trade) — import value between Saint Pierre and Miquelon and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
3 1000 USD, with Saint Pierre and Miquelon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Pierre and Miquelon and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
16 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2008.
How do Saint Pierre and Miquelon and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for soil working equipment (trade) — import value?
Saint Pierre and Miquelon ranks 175th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 178th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soil working equipment (trade) — Import Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Pierre and Miquelon vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Soil working equipment (trade) — Import Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/soil-working-equipment-trade-import-value/saint-pierre-and-miquelon/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/soil-working-equipment-trade-import-value/saint-pierre-and-miquelon/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Saint Pierre and Miquelon vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Soil working equipment (trade) — Import Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soil working equipment (trade) — Import Value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 8,281 data points, 1961–2009
Last refreshed

Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.