Kiribati vs Oman: Solid biofuels — Energy consumption
Solid biofuels — Energy consumption over time
- Kiribati
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 670.08 TJ against 574.78 TJ in Kiribati, a difference of 95.3 TJ.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 168th and Oman ranks 165th of 226 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 3 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 467.71 TJ | 122.69 TJ | 345.02 TJ | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 502.98 TJ | 178.52 TJ | 324.46 TJ | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 555.25 TJ | 525.08 TJ | 30.18 TJ | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 571.61 TJ | 645.1 TJ | 73.49 TJ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher solid biofuels — energy consumption, Kiribati or Oman?
- Oman, at 670.08 TJ against 574.78 TJ in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in solid biofuels — energy consumption between Kiribati and Oman?
- 95.3 TJ, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Oman?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Oman rank globally for solid biofuels — energy consumption?
- Kiribati ranks 168th and Oman ranks 165th of 226 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Solid biofuels — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.