Australia vs Kazakhstan: Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC

Australia
272,770 1000 ha
in 2022
Kazakhstan
63,167 1000 ha
in 2022
Australia rank
2nd
Kazakhstan rank
5th

Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k300.0k199220072022

How they compare

Australia currently reports 272,770 1000 ha against 63,167 1000 ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 209,603 1000 ha.

That makes Australia's figure about 4.3 times Kazakhstan's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 2nd and Kazakhstan ranks 5th of 219 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 279,004 1000 ha 66,556 1000 ha 212,447 1000 ha Australia
2000s 280,629 1000 ha 61,679 1000 ha 218,950 1000 ha Australia
2010s 280,457 1000 ha 62,709 1000 ha 217,748 1000 ha Australia
2020s 272,092 1000 ha 62,935 1000 ha 209,157 1000 ha Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sparsely natural vegetated areas — area from cci_lc, Australia or Kazakhstan?
Australia, at 272,770 1000 ha against 63,167 1000 ha in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
What is the difference in sparsely natural vegetated areas — area from cci_lc between Australia and Kazakhstan?
209,603 1000 ha, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for sparsely natural vegetated areas — area from cci_lc?
Australia ranks 2nd and Kazakhstan ranks 5th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sparsely-natural-vegetated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sparsely-natural-vegetated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.