Western Sahara vs Zimbabwe: Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC

Western Sahara
20.13 1000 ha
in 2022
Zimbabwe
18.15 1000 ha
in 2022
Western Sahara rank
88th
Zimbabwe rank
90th

Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC over time

  • Western Sahara
  • Zimbabwe
05101520199220072022

How they compare

Western Sahara currently reports 20.13 1000 ha against 18.15 1000 ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.98 1000 ha.

That makes Western Sahara's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Western Sahara has been ahead every year.

Western Sahara ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 224 countries.

Western Sahara has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Western Sahara Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 20.34 1000 ha 17.29 1000 ha 3.05 1000 ha Western Sahara
2000s 20.49 1000 ha 17.72 1000 ha 2.77 1000 ha Western Sahara
2010s 20.3 1000 ha 17.85 1000 ha 2.45 1000 ha Western Sahara
2020s 20.14 1000 ha 18 1000 ha 2.14 1000 ha Western Sahara

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sparsely natural vegetated areas — area from cci_lc, Western Sahara or Zimbabwe?
Western Sahara, at 20.13 1000 ha against 18.15 1000 ha in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in sparsely natural vegetated areas — area from cci_lc between Western Sahara and Zimbabwe?
1.98 1000 ha, with Western Sahara ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Western Sahara and Zimbabwe?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Western Sahara and Zimbabwe rank globally for sparsely natural vegetated areas — area from cci_lc?
Western Sahara ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 224 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Western Sahara vs Zimbabwe: Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sparsely-natural-vegetated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/western-sahara/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/sparsely-natural-vegetated-areas-area-from-cci-lc/western-sahara/zimbabwe/">Western Sahara vs Zimbabwe: Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sparsely natural vegetated areas — Area from CCI_LC
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 8,231 data points, 1992–2022
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.