Cuba vs Nauru: Standard Deviation, annual growth rate
Cuba
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Nauru
0 % change on previous year
in 1992
Cuba rank
9th
Nauru rank
9th
Standard Deviation, annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Nauru
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Nauru, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Nauru ahead.
Cuba ranks 9th and Nauru ranks 9th of 225 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | β |
| 1980s | 0 % change on previous year | -2.55 % change on previous year | 2.55 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher standard deviation, annual growth rate, Cuba or Nauru?
- Cuba, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in standard deviation, annual growth rate between Cuba and Nauru?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Nauru?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 1992.
- How do Cuba and Nauru rank globally for standard deviation, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 9th and Nauru ranks 9th of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Standard Deviation, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Standard Deviation. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.