Argentina vs Chile: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Argentina
- Chile
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 69,793 t against 66,140 t in Chile, a difference of 3,653 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Chile ahead.
Argentina ranks 12th and Chile ranks 13th of 83 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 161,410 t | 140,196 t | 21,213 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 262,942 t | 101,640 t | 161,303 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 83,421 t | 69,524 t | 13,898 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Argentina or Chile?
- Argentina, at 69,793 t against 66,140 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Argentina and Chile?
- 3,653 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Chile?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Chile rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Argentina ranks 12th and Chile ranks 13th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf