Argentina vs Sri Lanka: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Argentina
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 76,666 t against 69,793 t in Argentina, a difference of 6,873 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 10th and Sri Lanka ranks 9th of 76 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 174,875 t | 80,239 t | 94,636 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 184,830 t | 64,814 t | 120,015 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 121,167 t | 76,666 t | 44,501 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Argentina or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 76,666 t against 69,793 t in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Argentina and Sri Lanka?
- 6,873 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Sri Lanka?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Sri Lanka rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Argentina ranks 10th and Sri Lanka ranks 9th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf