Australia vs Bangladesh: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Australia
- Bangladesh
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 751,000 t against 700,323 t in Australia, a difference of 50,677 t.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Australia ranks 2nd and Bangladesh ranks 1st of 76 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Bangladesh | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 197,376 t | 380,959 t | 183,583 t | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 626,544 t | 644,857 t | 18,314 t | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Australia or Bangladesh?
- Bangladesh, at 751,000 t against 700,323 t in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Australia and Bangladesh?
- 50,677 t, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bangladesh?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Bangladesh rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Australia ranks 2nd and Bangladesh ranks 1st of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf