Bangladesh vs Brazil: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Bangladesh
- Brazil
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 751,000 t against 449,422 t in Brazil, a difference of 301,578 t.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.7 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Brazil ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 1st and Brazil ranks 3rd of 76 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 353,677 t | 1.51 million t | 1.15 million t | Brazil |
| 2010s | 556,667 t | 2.25 million t | 1.70 million t | Brazil |
| 2020s | 728,500 t | 449,360 t | 279,140 t | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Bangladesh or Brazil?
- Bangladesh, at 751,000 t against 449,422 t in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Bangladesh and Brazil?
- 301,578 t, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Brazil?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Brazil rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Bangladesh ranks 1st and Brazil ranks 3rd of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf