Brazil vs Côte d'Ivoire: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Brazil
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 449,422 t against 76,746 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 372,676 t.
That makes Brazil's figure about 5.9 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 3rd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 2nd of 76 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.76 million t | 7,592 t | 1.75 million t | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.91 million t | 13,574 t | 1.90 million t | Brazil |
| 2020s | 449,360 t | 67,714 t | 381,646 t | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Brazil or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Brazil, at 449,422 t against 76,746 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Brazil and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 372,676 t, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Brazil ranks 3rd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 2nd of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf