Colombia vs French Polynesia: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Colombia
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 3 t against 1 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 2 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 3.0 times French Polynesia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 69th and French Polynesia ranks 71st of 83 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,225 t | 24 t | 2,201 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 699 t | 40.75 t | 658.25 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 3 t | 1 t | 2 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Colombia or French Polynesia?
- Colombia, at 3 t against 1 t in French Polynesia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Colombia and French Polynesia?
- 2 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and French Polynesia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do Colombia and French Polynesia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Colombia ranks 69th and French Polynesia ranks 71st of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf