Colombia vs New Caledonia: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Colombia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 10 t against 3 t in Colombia, a difference of 7 t.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 3.3 times Colombia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 62nd and New Caledonia ranks 59th of 76 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,993 t | 51 t | 7,942 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 1,294 t | 40 t | 1,254 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Colombia or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 10 t against 3 t in Colombia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Colombia and New Caledonia?
- 7 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and New Caledonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Colombia and New Caledonia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Colombia ranks 62nd and New Caledonia ranks 59th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf