Cook Islands vs Pakistan: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Cook Islands
0 t
in 2023
Pakistan
0 t
in 2023
Cook Islands rank
66th
Pakistan rank
66th
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Cook Islands
- Pakistan
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Pakistan, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Cook Islands ranks 66th and Pakistan ranks 66th of 76 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.5 t | 26,004 t | 26,003 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 1 t | 6,880 t | 6,878 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Cook Islands or Pakistan?
- Cook Islands, at 0 t against 0 t in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Cook Islands and Pakistan?
- 0 t, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Pakistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Pakistan rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Cook Islands ranks 66th and Pakistan ranks 66th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf