Côte d'Ivoire vs Sri Lanka: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 76,746 t against 76,666 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 80 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 2nd and Sri Lanka ranks 9th of 2 groups.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,592 t | 98,885 t | 91,293 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 34,218 t | 67,151 t | 32,933 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 64,734 t | 76,666 t | 11,932 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Côte d'Ivoire or Sri Lanka?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 76,746 t against 76,666 t in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Côte d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka?
- 80 t, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 2nd and Sri Lanka ranks 9th of 2 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf