Croatia vs Switzerland: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Croatia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 1,257 t against 1,186 t in Croatia, a difference of 71 t.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Switzerland ahead.
Croatia ranks 33rd and Switzerland ranks 32nd of 76 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.5 t | 5,240 t | 5,146 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 1,530 t | 2,827 t | 1,297 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 1,504 t | 1,413 t | 90.6 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Croatia or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 1,257 t against 1,186 t in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Croatia and Switzerland?
- 71 t, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Switzerland?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Switzerland rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Croatia ranks 33rd and Switzerland ranks 32nd of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf