Cyprus vs Mauritius: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Cyprus
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 110 t against 76 t in Cyprus, a difference of 34 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.4 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 51st and Mauritius ranks 48th of 76 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 412.5 t | 399.33 t | 13.17 t | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 34 t | 67.5 t | 33.5 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 52.2 t | 185.8 t | 133.6 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Cyprus or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 110 t against 76 t in Cyprus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Cyprus and Mauritius?
- 34 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Mauritius?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Mauritius rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Cyprus ranks 51st and Mauritius ranks 48th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf