Czechia vs Japan: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Czechia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 10,500 t against 8,030 t in Czechia, a difference of 2,470 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Japan ahead.
Czechia ranks 26th and Japan ranks 24th of 75 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,630 t | 100,434 t | 95,804 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 6,508 t | 217,773 t | 211,266 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 11,444 t | 7,033 t | 4,411 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Czechia or Japan?
- Japan, at 10,500 t against 8,030 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Czechia and Japan?
- 2,470 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Japan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Japan rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Czechia ranks 26th and Japan ranks 24th of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf