Czechia vs United Arab Emirates: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Czechia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 8,030 t against 2,000 t in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 6,030 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 4.0 times United Arab Emirates's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 26th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 76 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,630 t | 1,000 t | 3,630 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 10,162 t | 1,571 t | 8,590 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Czechia or United Arab Emirates?
- Czechia, at 8,030 t against 2,000 t in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Czechia and United Arab Emirates?
- 6,030 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and United Arab Emirates?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2016.
- How do Czechia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Czechia ranks 26th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf