Dominican Republic vs Uruguay: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Dominican Republic
- Uruguay
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 61,116 t against 58,475 t in Uruguay, a difference of 2,641 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Uruguay ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 76 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,134 t | 24,850 t | 14,716 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 52,573 t | 58,281 t | 5,708 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Dominican Republic or Uruguay?
- Dominican Republic, at 61,116 t against 58,475 t in Uruguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Dominican Republic and Uruguay?
- 2,641 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Uruguay rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Dominican Republic ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf