Ecuador vs French Polynesia: Superphosphates above 35% β€” Agricultural Use

Ecuador
0 t
in 2019
French Polynesia
1 t
in 2022
Ecuador rank
73rd
French Polynesia rank
71st

Superphosphates above 35% β€” Agricultural Use over time

  • Ecuador
  • French Polynesia
01.0k2.0k3.0k200620142022

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Ecuador, a difference of 1 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 73rd and French Polynesia ranks 71st of 83 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% β€” agricultural use, Ecuador or French Polynesia?
French Polynesia, at 1 t against 0 t in Ecuador as of 2022.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% β€” agricultural use between Ecuador and French Polynesia?
1 t, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and French Polynesia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and French Polynesia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% β€” agricultural use?
Ecuador ranks 73rd and French Polynesia ranks 71st of 83 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% β€” Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% β€” Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
84 places, 953 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf