French Polynesia vs Pakistan: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- French Polynesia
- Pakistan
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Pakistan, a difference of 1 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Pakistan ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 64th and Pakistan ranks 66th of 75 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24 t | 19,883 t | 19,859 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 27.33 t | 2,293 t | 2,266 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0.3333 t | 0 t | 0.3333 t | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, French Polynesia or Pakistan?
- French Polynesia, at 1 t against 0 t in Pakistan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between French Polynesia and Pakistan?
- 1 t, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Pakistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do French Polynesia and Pakistan rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- French Polynesia ranks 64th and Pakistan ranks 66th of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf