Guyana vs United Arab Emirates: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Guyana
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 10,370 t against 2,000 t in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 8,370 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 5.2 times United Arab Emirates's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 25th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 76 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,196 t | 1,571 t | 1,625 t | Guyana |
| 2010s | 6,344 t | 1,000 t | 5,344 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Guyana or United Arab Emirates?
- Guyana, at 10,370 t against 2,000 t in United Arab Emirates as of 2011.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Guyana and United Arab Emirates?
- 8,370 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and United Arab Emirates?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Guyana and United Arab Emirates rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Guyana ranks 25th and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf