Peru vs Zimbabwe: Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use over time
- Peru
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 2,960 t against 1,834 t in Peru, a difference of 1,126 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 83 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,354 t | 1,560 t | 2,794 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 1,834 t | 2,960 t | 1,126 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use, Peru or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 2,960 t against 1,834 t in Peru as of 2011.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use between Peru and Zimbabwe?
- 1,126 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Peru and Zimbabwe rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — agricultural use?
- Peru ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf