Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Sri Lanka: Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
2.46 t
in 2023
Sri Lanka
1.84 t
in 2016
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) rank
61st
Sri Lanka rank
64th

Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
  • Sri Lanka
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k200220122023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) currently reports 2.46 t against 1.84 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.62 t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)'s figure about 1.3 times Sri Lanka's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 61st and Sri Lanka ranks 64th of 72 countries.

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2000s 61,654 t 2.77 t 61,651 t Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
2010s 18,880 t 2.56 t 18,877 t Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export quantity, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) or Sri Lanka?
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade), at 2.46 t against 1.84 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export quantity between Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Sri Lanka?
0.62 t, with Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Sri Lanka?
14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
How do Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Sri Lanka rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export quantity?
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 61st and Sri Lanka ranks 64th of 72 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Sri Lanka: Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/sri-lanka/">Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Sri Lanka: Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
106 places, 1,806 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf