Chile vs North Macedonia: Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity over time
- Chile
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.06 t against 0 t in Chile, a difference of 0.06 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Chile ranks 71st and North Macedonia ranks 69th of 72 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.42 t | 341 t | 269.58 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 8.29 t | 38.81 t | 30.52 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0.05 t | 0.05 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export quantity, Chile or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 0.06 t against 0 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export quantity between Chile and North Macedonia?
- 0.06 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Macedonia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Chile and North Macedonia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export quantity?
- Chile ranks 71st and North Macedonia ranks 69th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf