Czechia vs Papua New Guinea: Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity over time
- Czechia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 1.43 t against 0.1 t in Czechia, a difference of 1.33 t.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 14.3 times Czechia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 67th and Papua New Guinea ranks 65th of 72 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 735.81 t | 3.17 t | 732.64 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 489.96 t | 0.65 t | 489.31 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export quantity, Czechia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 1.43 t against 0.1 t in Czechia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export quantity between Czechia and Papua New Guinea?
- 1.33 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Czechia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export quantity?
- Czechia ranks 67th and Papua New Guinea ranks 65th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf