Jordan vs South Africa: Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity over time
- Jordan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 241.3 t against 194.49 t in Jordan, a difference of 46.81 t.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was South Africa ahead.
Jordan ranks 38th and South Africa ranks 37th of 72 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 490.22 t | 90,865 t | 90,375 t | South Africa |
| 2010s | 276.81 t | 2,279 t | 2,002 t | South Africa |
| 2020s | 319.93 t | 179.77 t | 140.16 t | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export quantity, Jordan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 241.3 t against 194.49 t in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export quantity between Jordan and South Africa?
- 46.81 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and South Africa rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export quantity?
- Jordan ranks 38th and South Africa ranks 37th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf