Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Costa Rica: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
0.8 1000 USD
in 2023
Costa Rica
4.51 1000 USD
in 2006
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) rank
59th
Costa Rica rank
57th

Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time

  • Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
  • Costa Rica
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k200220122023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 4.51 1000 USD against 0.8 1000 USD in Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade), a difference of 3.71 1000 USD.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 5.6 times Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 59th and Costa Rica ranks 57th of 72 countries.

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 4.51 1000 USD against 0.8 1000 USD in Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) as of 2006.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Costa Rica?
3.71 1000 USD, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Costa Rica?
5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2006.
How do Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Costa Rica rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 59th and Costa Rica ranks 57th of 72 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Costa Rica: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/costa-rica/">Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Costa Rica: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
106 places, 1,806 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf