Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Dominican Republic: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
0.8 1000 USD
in 2023
Dominican Republic
3.58 1000 USD
in 2021
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) rank
59th
Dominican Republic rank
58th

Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time

  • Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
  • Dominican Republic
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k200220122023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 3.58 1000 USD against 0.8 1000 USD in Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade), a difference of 2.78 1000 USD.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 4.5 times Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)'s.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 59th and Dominican Republic ranks 58th of 72 countries.

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
2010s 1,174 1000 USD 5.78 1000 USD 1,168 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
2020s 120.56 1000 USD 2.84 1000 USD 117.72 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) or Dominican Republic?
Dominican Republic, at 3.58 1000 USD against 0.8 1000 USD in Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) as of 2021.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Dominican Republic?
2.78 1000 USD, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Dominican Republic?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Dominican Republic rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 59th and Dominican Republic ranks 58th of 72 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Dominican Republic: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/dominican-republic/">Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Dominican Republic: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
106 places, 1,806 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf