Belgium vs Türkiye: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time
- Belgium
- Türkiye
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 10,053 1000 USD against 8,729 1000 USD in Türkiye, a difference of 1,324 1000 USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Türkiye's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 11th and Türkiye ranks 13th of 76 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32,602 1000 USD | 1,015 1000 USD | 31,586 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 17,257 1000 USD | 2,696 1000 USD | 14,561 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 8,802 1000 USD | 2,589 1000 USD | 6,213 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, Belgium or Türkiye?
- Belgium, at 10,053 1000 USD against 8,729 1000 USD in Türkiye as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between Belgium and Türkiye?
- 1,324 1000 USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Türkiye?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Türkiye rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
- Belgium ranks 11th and Türkiye ranks 13th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf