Chile vs Czechia: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time
- Chile
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.15 1000 USD against 0.1 1000 USD in Chile, a difference of 0.05 1000 USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.5 times Chile's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 73rd and Czechia ranks 71st of 76 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.53 1000 USD | 209.66 1000 USD | 168.13 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 8.63 1000 USD | 117.62 1000 USD | 108.99 1000 USD | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.07 1000 USD | 43.71 1000 USD | 43.64 1000 USD | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, Chile or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 0.15 1000 USD against 0.1 1000 USD in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between Chile and Czechia?
- 0.05 1000 USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Czechia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Czechia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
- Chile ranks 73rd and Czechia ranks 71st of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf