Hungary vs Uruguay: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time
- Hungary
- Uruguay
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 961.32 1000 USD against 568.81 1000 USD in Uruguay, a difference of 392.51 1000 USD.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.7 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uruguay ahead.
Hungary ranks 30th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 76 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11 1000 USD | 4,861 1000 USD | 4,850 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 295.45 1000 USD | 6,077 1000 USD | 5,782 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 349.7 1000 USD | 634.84 1000 USD | 285.14 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, Hungary or Uruguay?
- Hungary, at 961.32 1000 USD against 568.81 1000 USD in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between Hungary and Uruguay?
- 392.51 1000 USD, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Uruguay rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
- Hungary ranks 30th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf