India vs Viet Nam: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time
- India
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 18.63 1000 USD against 16.89 1000 USD in India, a difference of 1.74 1000 USD.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times India's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Viet Nam ahead.
India ranks 52nd and Viet Nam ranks 50th of 76 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,060 1000 USD | 293.84 1000 USD | 766.5 1000 USD | India |
| 2010s | 516.62 1000 USD | 510.58 1000 USD | 6.04 1000 USD | India |
| 2020s | 25.33 1000 USD | 46.97 1000 USD | 21.63 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, India or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 18.63 1000 USD against 16.89 1000 USD in India as of 2022.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between India and Viet Nam?
- 1.74 1000 USD, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Viet Nam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do India and Viet Nam rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
- India ranks 52nd and Viet Nam ranks 50th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf