Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time
- Kazakhstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.57 1000 USD against 0.43 1000 USD in Namibia, a difference of 0.14 1000 USD.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 67th and Namibia ranks 69th of 76 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,473 1000 USD | 1.43 1000 USD | 1,472 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 359.21 1000 USD | 0.225 1000 USD | 358.99 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, Kazakhstan or Namibia?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.57 1000 USD against 0.43 1000 USD in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 0.14 1000 USD, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2015.
- How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
- Kazakhstan ranks 67th and Namibia ranks 69th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf