Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) vs Uruguay: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value

Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)
0.15 1000 USD
in 2023
Uruguay
568.81 1000 USD
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) rank
27th
Uruguay rank
29th

Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)
  • Uruguay
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k200220132024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 568.81 1000 USD against 0.15 1000 USD in Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade), a difference of 568.66 1000 USD.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 3,792.1 times Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uruguay ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) ranks 27th and Uruguay ranks 29th of 30 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 371.19 1000 USD 4,766 1000 USD 4,395 1000 USD Uruguay
2010s 575.45 1000 USD 5,448 1000 USD 4,872 1000 USD Uruguay
2020s 132.33 1000 USD 1.71 1000 USD 130.62 1000 USD Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 568.81 1000 USD against 0.15 1000 USD in Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) as of 2024.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) and Uruguay?
568.66 1000 USD, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) and Uruguay?
18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) and Uruguay rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) ranks 27th and Uruguay ranks 29th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) vs Uruguay: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/land-locked-developing-countries-excluding-intra-trade/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/land-locked-developing-countries-excluding-intra-trade/uruguay/">Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) vs Uruguay: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
106 places, 1,806 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf