Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) vs Uzbekistan: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value

Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)
0.15 1000 USD
in 2023
Uzbekistan
518.84 1000 USD
in 2020
Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) rank
27th
Uzbekistan rank
30th

Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)
  • Uzbekistan
02.0k4.0k6.0k200220122023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 518.84 1000 USD against 0.15 1000 USD in Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade), a difference of 518.69 1000 USD.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 3,458.9 times Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 30 groups.

Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 592.46 1000 USD 1,540 1000 USD 947.51 1000 USD Uzbekistan
2010s 518.6 1000 USD 771.18 1000 USD 252.58 1000 USD Uzbekistan
2020s 132.33 1000 USD 518.84 1000 USD 386.51 1000 USD Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 518.84 1000 USD against 0.15 1000 USD in Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) as of 2020.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) and Uzbekistan?
518.69 1000 USD, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) and Uzbekistan?
15 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) and Uzbekistan rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) ranks 27th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) vs Uzbekistan: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/land-locked-developing-countries-excluding-intra-trade/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/land-locked-developing-countries-excluding-intra-trade/uzbekistan/">Land Locked Developing Countries (excluding intra-trade) vs Uzbekistan: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
106 places, 1,806 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf