Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) vs Zimbabwe: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value

Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade)
0.03 1000 USD
in 2023
Zimbabwe
193.8 1000 USD
in 2017
Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) rank
30th
Zimbabwe rank
33rd

Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time

  • Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade)
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k200220122023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 193.8 1000 USD against 0.03 1000 USD in Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade), a difference of 193.77 1000 USD.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 6,460.0 times Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 30 groups.

Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 611.59 1000 USD 5.45 1000 USD 606.14 1000 USD Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade)
2010s 1,433 1000 USD 94.95 1000 USD 1,339 1000 USD Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 193.8 1000 USD against 0.03 1000 USD in Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) as of 2017.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) and Zimbabwe?
193.77 1000 USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) and Zimbabwe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2017.
How do Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) and Zimbabwe rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) vs Zimbabwe: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/least-developed-countries-excluding-intra-trade/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/least-developed-countries-excluding-intra-trade/zimbabwe/">Least Developed Countries (excluding intra-trade) vs Zimbabwe: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
106 places, 1,806 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf