Saudi Arabia vs Uruguay: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 834.57 1000 USD against 568.81 1000 USD in Uruguay, a difference of 265.76 1000 USD.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.5 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uruguay ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 31st and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 76 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 998.32 1000 USD | 4,609 1000 USD | 3,611 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 385.77 1000 USD | 4,668 1000 USD | 4,282 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, Saudi Arabia or Uruguay?
- Saudi Arabia, at 834.57 1000 USD against 568.81 1000 USD in Uruguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between Saudi Arabia and Uruguay?
- 265.76 1000 USD, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Uruguay rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 31st and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf