Serbia vs Uruguay: Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time
- Serbia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 568.81 1000 USD against 395.17 1000 USD in Serbia, a difference of 173.64 1000 USD.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.4 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Uruguay ahead.
Serbia ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 76 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 462.7 1000 USD | 5,719 1000 USD | 5,256 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 1,509 1000 USD | 4,609 1000 USD | 3,101 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 835.45 1000 USD | 285.26 1000 USD | 550.19 1000 USD | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, Serbia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 568.81 1000 USD against 395.17 1000 USD in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between Serbia and Uruguay?
- 173.64 1000 USD, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
- Serbia ranks 35th and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf