United Republic of Tanzania vs Western Asia (excluding intra-trade): Superphosphates above 35% — Export value

United Republic of Tanzania
1,461 1000 USD
in 2024
Western Asia (excluding intra-trade)
385,089 1000 USD
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd
Western Asia (excluding intra-trade) rank
5th

Superphosphates above 35% — Export value over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Western Asia (excluding intra-trade)
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k200220132024

How they compare

Western Asia (excluding intra-trade) currently reports 385,089 1000 USD against 1,461 1000 USD in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 383,628 1000 USD.

That makes Western Asia (excluding intra-trade)'s figure about 263.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Western Asia (excluding intra-trade) has been ahead every year.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd and Western Asia (excluding intra-trade) ranks 5th of 4 countries.

Western Asia (excluding intra-trade) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania Western Asia (excluding intra-trade) Difference Ahead
2000s 47.77 1000 USD 334,300 1000 USD 334,252 1000 USD Western Asia (excluding intra-trade)
2010s 648.06 1000 USD 357,190 1000 USD 356,542 1000 USD Western Asia (excluding intra-trade)
2020s 36,149 1000 USD 381,296 1000 USD 345,147 1000 USD Western Asia (excluding intra-trade)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — export value, United Republic of Tanzania or Western Asia (excluding intra-trade)?
Western Asia (excluding intra-trade), at 385,089 1000 USD against 1,461 1000 USD in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — export value between United Republic of Tanzania and Western Asia (excluding intra-trade)?
383,628 1000 USD, with Western Asia (excluding intra-trade) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Western Asia (excluding intra-trade)?
15 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and Western Asia (excluding intra-trade) rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — export value?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd and Western Asia (excluding intra-trade) ranks 5th of 4 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs Western Asia (excluding intra-trade): Superphosphates above 35% — Export value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/united-republic-of-tanzania/western-asia-excluding-intra-trade/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/superphosphates-above-35-percent-export-value/united-republic-of-tanzania/western-asia-excluding-intra-trade/">United Republic of Tanzania vs Western Asia (excluding intra-trade): Superphosphates above 35% — Export value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Export value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
106 places, 1,806 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf