Afghanistan vs Suriname: Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity
Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity over time
- Afghanistan
- Suriname
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 340 t against 314.41 t in Suriname, a difference of 25.59 t.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 76th and Suriname ranks 77th of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,293 t | 202.13 t | 3,091 t | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 137.97 t | 174.62 t | 36.66 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import quantity, Afghanistan or Suriname?
- Afghanistan, at 340 t against 314.41 t in Suriname as of 2016.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import quantity between Afghanistan and Suriname?
- 25.59 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2013.
- How do Afghanistan and Suriname rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import quantity?
- Afghanistan ranks 76th and Suriname ranks 77th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf